OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

coel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (COEL-133) PQI: Is a data engine required to return atoms in the latest form, or only historical forms?


    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/COEL-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=65750#comment-65750 ] 

Paul Bruton commented on COEL-133:
----------------------------------

We stick with the view that the caller must be able to get back atoms (minimal mandatory requirements). Use of 'exclude' in the query might make the output not a compliant atom.
On the version question: The DE can decide return only the latest version of atoms.


> PQI: Is a data engine required to return atoms in the latest form, or only historical forms?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COEL-133
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/COEL-133
>             Project: OASIS Classification of Everyday Living (COEL) TC
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Paul Bruton
>
> In the PQI, we ought to state what is required of a data engine that has a store of Atoms of various versions.
> Is it only ever required to return Atoms in the form they were originally submitted?
> Is it permitted that a Data Engine only returns Atoms in the latest approved form?
> The PQI says that some queries return Atoms and also says that certain fields can be omitted: In this case, the return might not be a compliant Atom (because it could be missing mandatory fields). Do we allow this?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]