conformance message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [conformance] new version Conformance Requirements Document
- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, conformance@lists.oasis-open.org,Todd_Margo@stercomm.com, PDeSmedt@viquity.com, Beth@drummondgroup.com,sandra.martinez@nist.gov
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 07:43:38 -0500
Thank you for the comment. It is helpful for targeting
the editorial clean-up. I realize that there is additional clean-up
that needs to be done, including ensuring that all references are cited
correctly and fully, fix typos, check consistency and appropriateness of
word usage (affect vs effect, capitalize or no capitalize, typos,
etc)
Lynne
At 06:27 PM 3/5/02, Lofton Henderson wrote:
Here are a couple of minor
editorials that need fixing:
misspelling, SAHLL
misspelling, REOMMENDED
line 404: this is the only place where MUST is used instead of
SHALL (other than in the normative definitions themselves).
-Lofton.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC