[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [courtfiling-blue] Groups - LegalXML Blue Requirements Final Draft (wd-LegalXML-Requirements-08.doc) uploaded
Eric, It's a good draft but could still use some work. Here are my comments: General Comment #1: The document needs to be reorganized to improve flow and comprehension. We also need introductions and transitions to explain, for instance, how MDEs relate to the overall system. I suggest something like: Introduction Scope Definitions (new) Process Interactions Filing Functional Requirements Filing System Use Cases Filing MDEs Filing MDE Use Cases Filing Message Types (expanded) Filing Policy Electronic Service Functional Requirements Electronic Service System Use Cases (new) Electronic Service MDEs Electronic Service MDE Use Cases Electronic Service Message Types (new) Electronic Service Policy (new?) Non-Functional Requirements Appendices General Comment #2: In the Definitions, we need to be clear that "time" elements include both date and time of day. General Comment #3: Differences in case are confusing. Is there a difference between "Filer" or "filer"? General Comment #4: We need to define the scope of the specification at a high-level. What is in and out of scope for Blue? Specific Comments (Line references included): 216-219: Do we need both case-related parties and filing-related parties? Later references to these elements are limited to filing-related parties (e.g. 337) 236-237: The system should also support simple filing models (e.g. fixed filing fees) without necessarily requiring interaction with the Court's case management system. 226: The definition for Lead Document is not clear. A Lead Document is the document in every filing that requires entry in the Court Docket or register of actions. We also need to be clear on whether multiple lead documents are allowed in a single filing. 249-251: I think it is a fixed amount, not an upper limit. 315: The first step in the Review Filing use case should be "The System presents the filing to the Filing Review Clerk". 317: Should be "filings data are satisfactory". 346: We need to be clear that this calculation process is the same as in 236-237. It is not two different systems or MDEs doing the calculating. 711: We need to define MDEs and describe how the use cases are organized. It is not clear how the use cases in Section 4. are matched with their MDEs. Some use cases may need to moved to different MDEs. 1060: The Court Record MDE is "among the most critical potions of a LegalXML system" but there are no relevant use cases for it? 1501: We need to be clear that the registration process and interface between the user and service provider is outside the scope of this specification. 1667: Filing Message is not a functional requirement. It should be moved to a subsection under Filing Functional Requirements. Where are the other Message Types? 1682-1709: The elements in Filing Message need to include definitions. 1720-1731: Filing States and Document States are not NonFunctional Requirements. These should be moved to a subsection under Filing Functional Requirements. 1738-1768: Court Policy is not a NonFunctional Requirement. It should be moved to Filing Functional Requirements 1769-1788: The directory should include the necessary metadata and interfaces to allow MDEs to search for one another. Jim Cabral James E. Cabral Jr. MTG Management Consultants, L.L.C. 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98101-3201 (206) 442-5010 www.mtgmc.com The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. -----Original Message----- From: etingom@tsquaredinteractive.com [mailto:etingom@tsquaredinteractive.com] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 8:52 PM To: courtfiling-blue@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [courtfiling-blue] Groups - LegalXML Blue Requirements Final Draft (wd-LegalXML-Requirements-08.doc) uploaded The document named LegalXML Blue Requirements Final Draft (wd-LegalXML-Requirements-08.doc) has been submitted by Eric Tingom to the LegalXML Court Filing Blue Drafting SC document repository. Document Description: Important notes: 1. Latest version of Blue Requirements. 2. I am working on Blue Specifications 3. Please have all comments on these documents completed by April 18th, 2005 by 5:00 p.m. -7 G.M.T. Any comments received will then be incorporated before the vote. Thank you for your participation and support of Blue Eric View Document Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/courtfiling-blue/document.p hp?document_id=12116 Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/courtfiling-blue/download.p hp/12116/wd-LegalXML-Requirements-08.doc PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. -OASIS Open Administration
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]