[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Comment Set 1 - Updated Message Types (wd-LegalXML-Specifications-02.doc)
|
Here are my comments on the message type
document. They will come out in more than one e-mail message each one
labeled as a comment set. I will be using is my citation method line
numbers. ·
100 --
filing ID -- column 2 -- for a reviewed filing -- might be better wording ·
General
comment across the document -- all items of type ID -- should all of these
reference the unique ID scheme that was brought forward on May 17 and accepted
at that time -- I suggest this is a real good idea. When I read the point
on the unique identifier for the machine, some machines do not have native
unique addresses. The proposal of May 17 covers that condition. ·
General
comment across the document -- payment information -- this section will be
replaced by the UBL information correct? At minimum we missing the new
identifier code that's used for practically all non-card credit card
transactions. ·
103 -- I
think we need more detail on the protocol were going to use for sequence
ID. I believe we only need to limit it to an integer value. ·
General
comment across the board in the document -- should all tables have a column for
cardinality? ·
123 --
You may want to add been more explicit statement that it does not ensure the
information will be stored in the case management system nor the document
management system. Further, it does not ensure that it will be stored at
all! ·
150 -- I
think we need to have a textual section here and indicating that the purpose of
this is to signal the completion of the activity. It is not an indication
of the individual "private" activities that go on within the creation
of the court record. More explicitly, it does not give a field by field
value by value confirmation of the private activity. ·
159 --
ibid. my comments at 150 but pertaining to a review of the filing. I will begin the Court Policy message
information extraction upon the completion of the first review of the message
types and their incorporation into the document. I will focus on the run
time Court Policy message information first and will get that out
expeditiously. I will follow on the table of information required for the
set up of a filer with a specific court. Regards, Don Donald L. Bergeron |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]