Re: [cti-cybox] IP Address Notation (or: I Love CIDR When It's Talking About More Than One IP Address)

["Jason Keirstead" <Jason.Keirstead@ca.ibm.com>]

These are two different problems.

The way grammar is defined in an RFC or other spec and the way a library validates that grammar are aligned pretty much never. Do standard libraries use ABNF to validate the format of IPs? No they do not...

-
Jason Keirstead
STSM, Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com

Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown


Trey Darley ---01/22/2016 06:36:59 AM---On 21.01.2016 14:31:10, Kirillov, Ivan A. wrote: >

From: Trey Darley <trey@soltra.com>
To: <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 01/22/2016 06:36 AM
Subject: Re: [cti-cybox] IP Address Notation (or: I Love CIDR When It's Talking About More Than One IP Address)
Sent by: <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

On 21.01.2016 14:31:10, Kirillov, Ivan A. wrote:
> 
> My only qualm with ABNF is that it’s not supported in JSON Schema
> for field-level validation; only regexes can be used [0].
> 

Oi vey! Even better, JSON Schema only supports a subset of PCRE. :-/

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B  A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
--
"Every networking problem always takes longer to solve than it seems
like it should." --RFC 1925
[attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Jason Keirstead/CanEast/IBM]