Re: [cti-cybox] MVP/Message Objects

[Trey Darley <trey@kingfisherops.com>]

On 08.07.2016 08:22:00, Jason Keirstead wrote:
> If we make an email object now, and then in the future decide we
> should have made a base Message object with an Email extension -
> wouldn't that require a new major release because we'd be removing
> an object?
> 

Hey, Jason -

In that case (which is speculative, mind, a not a given), we could
update the normative text to deprecate the initial MVP Email object in
favor of the New Thing without requiring a major release.

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations, sprl
gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4  5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is
nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
--RFC 1925

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature