Re: [cti-cybox] Network Flow

["Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>]

Yes, it seems like the discussion went several different ways.  However, it also felt like there was pretty good support for renaming it to be Network Flow.  Maybe a simple poll?  Or a yay/nay verbal vote?

Thanks,

Bret

Bret Jordan CISSP

Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO

Symantec

PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050

"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 

On Sep 15, 2016, at 09:24, Kirillov, Ivan A. <ikirillov@mitre.org> wrote:

I’m not sure that we had consensus either way – the last discussion seemed to spiral off into separate threads about use cases and network traffic modeling in general. All good discussions but I’m not sure where we really stand on the network flow vs. network connection issue.

 

Regards,

Ivan

 

From: <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Bret Jordan <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
Date: Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 7:54 AM
To: "cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [cti-cybox] Network Flow

 

Where did we end up on renaming Network Connection to Network Flow?  

 

Thanks,

 

Bret

 

 

 

Bret Jordan CISSP

Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO

Symantec

PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050

"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 

 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail