[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Proposal to establish Sightings (#306) and Relationships (#291) as our official issue topics under active consideration for STIX v2.0
>We just need to realize that solving this will be an implementation or deployment level issue, not a spec issue. Each vendor or product may choose to keep or just increment or do a hodgepodge of both.
I would agree with this. :-)
sean
From: "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 1:43 PM To: John Wunder <jwunder@mitre.org> Cc: Jason Keirstead <Jason.Keirstead@CA.IBM.COM>, "Barnum, Sean D." <sbarnum@mitre.org>, Jerome Athias <athiasjerome@gmail.com>, "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org>, "Taylor, Marlon" <Marlon.Taylor@hq.dhs.gov>, Mark Davidson <mdavidson@mitre.org>, Terry MacDonald <terry@soltra.com> Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Proposal to establish Sightings (#306) and Relationships (#291) as our official issue topics under active consideration for STIX v2.0
Both cases are valuable. We currently track both today in our Global Intelligence Network. Knowing the difference between something that has been seen by 3 people in the industrial controls sector and something that has been seen by 50% of the internet is
different.
Both are valuable. And I think Jason brings up a good point. We just need to realize that solving this will be an implementation or deployment level issue, not a spec issue. Each vendor or product may choose to keep or just increment or do
a hodgepodge of both.
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]