[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Focusing our active discussions a little
Based on http://stixproject.github.io/documentation/concepts/data-markings/,
here's what we have now:
<stix:Handling>
<marking:Marking>
<marking:Controlled_Structure>//node() | //@*</marking:Controlled_Structure>
</marking:Marking>
</stix:Handling>
<more stuff that's marked...maybe?></more stuff>
</STIXPackage>
And to select anything non-trivial, I have to consult the XSD spellbook for things like "../../../descendant-or-self::node() | ../../../descendant-or-self::node()/@*"
As a fan of KISS and DRY, here's what I want: <STIXPackage TLP="green">
<Indicator TLP="amber">
<Email>
<Recipient="mary@uhoh.com" TLP="red">
<Subject>Buy my $tock$</Subject>
<Body>Please please click here</Body>
</Email>
</Indicator>
</STIXPackage>
But even then as a Python developer, I don't really want to mess with XML. I'd be happiest with something like this:
email = Indicator(TLP="amber")
email.recipient = Recipient( "mary@uhoh.com", TLP="red")
email.subject = "Buy my $tock$"
package = STIXPackage(TLP="green")
package.add_indicator(email)
JSA
From: cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Barnum, Sean D. <sbarnum@mitre.org>
Sent: Monday, November 9, 2015 3:03 PM To: Aharon Chernin; Jordan, Bret Cc: cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Focusing our active discussions a little One quick comment on the Xpath items below:
One the point of "Find a new home for Information Source, outside of Handling/Marking”, this would likely be addressed by
Issue #233 dealing with abstracting Source to a separate object. This would allow Sources to be specified and then all sorts of content from that source to simply reference it
using an appropriate Relationship rather than defining it inline.
sean
From: Aharon Chernin <achernin@soltra.com>
Date: Monday, November 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM To: "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>, "Barnum, Sean D." <sbarnum@mitre.org> Cc: "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Focusing our active discussions a little I agree with Sean that we need to get Sightings and Relationships nailed down. However, I need to get this off my chest before I forget.
Soltra Marking Proposal for Discussion:
Issues (I will have Terry add these to the Issue tracker):
Solution for Discussion.
Aharon
--
Aharon Chernin
CTO SOLTRA |
An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
18301 Bermuda green Dr
Tampa, fl 33647
813.470.2173 | achernin@soltra.com
From: <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>
Date: Monday, November 9, 2015 at 12:48 PM To: "Sean D. Barnum" <sbarnum@mitre.org> Cc: "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Focusing our active discussions a little We seem to have a lot of momentum right now on Data Marking. It would be a shame to lose that. Might I suggest that we take the next 10 days and try and drive Data Markings to consensus?
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]