Re: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000

[Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>]

You want UTC, not GMT (unless you're just
implementing it in the UK).

This proposal just states that the timestamps
should have a capability to express nanosecond
precision.  That's quite different than implementing
the capability.   For implementations, you want to
express the capability in terms of "uncertainty."
In addition, no one has said anything about the
use of trust mechanisms such as certs.

--tony

On 2015-11-23 10:23 AM, Jason Keirstead wrote:
> So, the proposal is that all timestamps should be RFC3339 with 
> nanosecond precision, in GMT. Does anyone have an argument against this?