Re: [cti-stix] STIX timestamps and ISO 8601:2000

[Jerome Athias <athiasjerome@gmail.com>]

I don't mind buying the last version if you feel it would be needed
for me to review?
While talking about implementation, optimization... there is some
decent docs from/around apache log4j
We should not be perfect first time. But some kind of regex-like in
the spec + guidance would be a good start (that could be reviewed over
time)

PS: for time gurus
http://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/Service/Glossary/tai.html?nn=14894


2015-11-26 1:25 GMT+03:00 Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>:
> Does anyone actually have a copy of this
> specification?  At $173, no one is likely to
> ever purchase it.  Everyone discusses it,
> but has anyone ever seen it?
>
> On 2015-11-25 4:17 PM, Struse, Richard wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, I think we are all talking about ISO 8601:2004 not the
> earlier versions which allowed two-digit years.   Not sure how to interpret
> #3 – ISO 8601 allows for the least
>
>
>