Re: [cti-stix] Re: [EXT] [cti-stix] Location, latitude/longitude, and precision

[Bret Jordan <Bret_Jordan@symantec.com>]

I disagree
Bret 


Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 19, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Trey Darley <trey@newcontext.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 19.07.2017 12:47:55, Struse, Richard J. wrote:
>> I’ve come to believe that precision should be optional. The purist
>> in me wants the text to say that if precision is omitted, the
>> precision of the lat/long is unspecified. But I’m willing to live
>> with text that says if precision is unspecified, it defaults to 10km
>> as John-Mark originally proposed.
>> 
> 
> Thanks, Rich.
> 
> I think this is the correct approach.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Trey
> ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
> Director of Standards Development, New Context
> gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
> ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
> --
> "No matter how hard you try, you can't make a baby in much less than 9
> months. Trying to speed this up *might* make it slower, but it won't
> make it happen any quicker." --RFC 1925