[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Malware SDO Remaining Open Questions
On 27.10.2017 16:43:32, Kirillov, Ivan A. wrote: > My own thoughts: > > 1. I feel like name should be flexible – we already have the samples > property for capturing the information about the binaries > associated with the malware, including their filenames. > > 2. “Exploits” is much clearer and preferable than “targets” with > regards to vulnerabilities (I’ve never seen any malware reporting > which states that malware “targets” a vulnerability) so it’s worth > making a breaking change for this. > I concur entirely with Ivan's perspective. -- Cheers, Trey ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ Director of Standards Development, New Context gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F 018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338 ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ -- "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice; in practice there is." --anonymous
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]