Re: [cti-stix] Re: CTI/Council interaction on Infrastructure SDO’s

[Trey Darley <trey@newcontext.com>]

On 16.11.2017 08:25:41, Carol Geyer wrote:
> 
> Perhaps the way for the Council to approach it would be to say
> something like "we need whatever solution y'all come up with to meet
> the following objectives (or solve the following problems or...)"
> rather than getting into something that sounds like "well, we vote
> for that technical solution." In other words, have the Council
> address the parameters of the problem rather than get into the
> debates about how to solve it.
> 

All -

There's broad consensus within the CTI TC that we *need* an
Infrastructure SDO in STIX. There's just a lot of work ahead of us to
define the object's properties and relationships. Unless the Council
are able to do that work for us, it's unclear to me how their input
will help accelerate our velocity.

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F  018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"There are two types of people: those who fit into my taxonomy and
those who do not." --anonymous

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature