[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] RE: New property names for previous label properties
On 17.05.2018 19:57:42, Katz, Gary CTR DC3/TSD wrote: > All I care about is that we don’t use the word ‘classification’. > Please keep in mind, this may one day in a government network go > through a cross-domain-solution or some agency gets a request to > search for anything classified and does a keyword search on > ‘classification’ or there is a government lawyer/official who does > not have the capacity to understand that the word ‘classification’ > in a STIX document does not mean the same thing they think it means > (even though it clearly does not). > To Gary's point, I propose amending option #3 to use the term "category" rather than "classification". -- Cheers, Trey ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ Director of Standards Development, New Context gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F 018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338 ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ -- "I urge you to please notice when you are happy, and exclaim or murmur or think at some point, 'If this isn’t nice, I don't know what is.'" --Kurt Vonnegut
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]