[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] OASIS CTI - Need to recruit
I would concur with the view that OASIS CTI TC provides key elements for the success of the broader objectives of initiatives like DHS-15-NPPD-128-001, but that these related initiatives fall
outside of the OASIS CTI TC scope. Similar in the way other standards like OASIS Legal-XML, OASIS CIQ, etc. could play key roles in defining the schematic and conceptual models of the broader Information Sharing (ISAC/ISAO) Ecosystems. (Note: use of OASIS
representative examples in this _expression_ of opinion is not intended to exclude any other International Standards)
FYI: DHS-15-NPPD-128-001 Standards for Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations (ISAO)
Patrick Maroney
Office:
(856)983-0001
Cell:
(609)841-5104
Email:
pmaroney@specere.org
From: Peter Allor <pallor@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 5:01 PM To: "tony@yaanatech.com" <tony@yaanatech.com> Cc: Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>, "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>, "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: Re: [cti] OASIS CTI - Need to recruit Tony,
Regards, Pete Tony Rutkowski ---06/02/2015 02:56:48 PM---Hi Peter, Do you have a pointer to the RFP/RFCs? From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> To: Peter Allor/Atlanta/IBM@IBMUS Cc: Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>, "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com>, "cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> Date: 06/02/2015 02:56 PM Subject: Re: [cti] OASIS CTI - Need to recruit Sent by: <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> Hi Peter, Do you have a pointer to the RFP/RFCs? There is a real global need here, and it is quite immediate without any good existing alternatives. Already in some venues like ITU-T, other some national administrations are pushing for that body to provide a similar function. Registry functions are inherently in scope for the supporting standards body secretariat, e.g., IANA for IETF among many others. --tony On 2015-06-02 08:49 PM, Peter Allor wrote: I am not in favor of an ISAO registry as part of this effort and see that as out of scope. I say that from an ISAC and SCC perspective as I have watched Administrations change this and look to go around current efforts that they encouraged (PDD-63, HSPD-7, PPD-21). Further there is an RFP and an RFC out on these issues and they pint to other processes/efforts. Peter Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 2, 2015, at 14:35, Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> wrote: > > Hi Chet, > > It is fairly common for standards body > secretariats to be tasked with registry > functions. I don't know how many such > registries the OASIS secretariat has > established over the years. Minimally > there is the persistent XML schema registry. > > There is a rather fundamental need to establish > in conjunction with the CTI work, a ISOA > registry as a means for STIX user communities > to engage in discovery and self-organization. > The Executive Order certainly encourages if not > requires such activity. Given the considerable > diversity of ISOAs globally, instantiating that > function in the OASIS secretariat seems like a > good way forward. CTI could find other alternatives, > but the obvious and easiest solution is the one > closest to home so to speak. > > --tony > > >> On 2015-06-02 06:51 PM, Chet Ensign wrote: >> Tony, that is an interesting observation. I'm not sure that a TC can >> task OASIS with doing this but the TC itself could certainly become >> the home for such a registry. I see the value of it... > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]