Re: [cti] NFV and CTI relationships

[Jerome Athias <athiasjerome@gmail.com>]

Yes I concur that NFV should be followed/engaged

IETF i2nsf could be promising

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/i2nsf/charter/

On Wednesday, 22 July 2015, Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com> wrote:

Hi Rich,

The attached cover sheet is for a set of materials
we are submitting into next week's NFV SEC
subcommittee meeting in San Jose.  The NFV
plenary and its various subcommittees are
meeting in the convention center.

As noted in the abstract, the contribution
describes the context and activities of the
TC CTI and includes mapping NFV
security requirements and work items into
the initial platforms being advanced by
TC CTI.  CybOX (and MAEC although not
presently under CTI) are especially relevant.
The intent is to create a formal relationship
as well as the basis for a work item on
the subject.  Given the specialized
nature of NFV, the work is probably best
done there.

If any CTI-ers are among the hundreds at
the NFV meetings next week, or otherwise
want to be a part of this work, let me know.

best,
tony