[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti] F2F Update & Call for agenda topics
My own $0.02 - I have always seen the F2F as an opportunity to close off on some long-discussion threads on the email list in a more cogent forum, and also an opportunity to deep-dive into some other very technical topics that are difficult to discuss over email in a timely fashion. My question on this is, is there enough "technical meat" here to warrant taking time away from other topics? I am not sure there is.
Yes, the act is very important from a logistical POV. But what, if any, are the explicit technical implications here to STIX? I have read through the act and also Tony's reference model PPT and I am not sure there are any actual explicit implications. If so, what are they? The act as worded does not get into the level of detail on sharing mechanisms that it would have relevance to STIX in my opinion.
I guess what I am saying - if we would spend significant time here - I would like to see a more detailed description of what would be discussed here at a technical level, as it isn't clear to me.
-
Jason Keirstead
Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com
Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown
Tony Rutkowski ---01/04/2016 03:01:26 PM---That should read, of course, "...a topic more important..." unless one regards the Act and its imple
From: Tony Rutkowski <tony@yaanatech.com>
To: Jamie Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>
Cc: Mark Davidson <mdavidson@soltra.com>, Rich Struse <richard.struse@dhs.gov>, cti@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: 01/04/2016 03:01 PM
Subject: Re: [cti] F2F Update & Call for agenda topics
Sent by: <cti@lists.oasis-open.org>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]