[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [EXT] [cti] Motion for Open Repository for STIX Enhancement Proposals
On 24.07.2018 21:36:41, Bret Jordan wrote: > I will not retract my objection because we do not yet know if and > how this process is going to work. > Bret, you have not articulated any harm that would be caused by allowing this to go forward. What we want to do is contribute a substantial body of work to the TC in a standardized format (with normative text and JSON schema) which can be used by others in the ICS space. The TC *might* decide to incorporate this set of contributions into the standard at some point. It might not. The TC *might* adopt some formalized process for STIX Enhancements at some point down the road, at which point it will be a trivial exercise for us to take this normalized set of contributions and transfer that into whatever the formal TC process winds up being. You and Jason have long been complaining about a lack of agility but your words and your actions are in direct conflict. It appears that you are being obstructionist and for the life of me I cannot ascertain what your motivation is. -- Cheers, Trey ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ Director of Standards Development, New Context gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F 018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338 ++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++ -- "More and more we are into communications; and less and less into communication." --Studs Terkel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]