[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter due by EOB Tomorrow
I agree. I have a model for the combination of frameworks that I will show the group at next session. I don't see a reason to hold up the charter. robin -----Original Message----- From: Cummins, Fred A [mailto:fred.cummins@eds.com] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:48 PM To: Robin Basham Subject: RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter due by EOB Tomorrow Robin, I'm not sure what this means. If you mean the date must have well-defined and consistent semantics, I'm okay with that. I'm not sure what the multiple frameworks and standards are--that is pretty broad. If you mean that all DCML records/messages must be consistent with the data model, I'm okay with that, but it needs to be stated less ambiguously ;-) Fred >-----Original Message----- >From: Robin Basham [mailto:robinbasham@rcn.com] >Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:03 PM >To: Cummins, Fred A >Cc: dcml-appserv@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML >charter due by EOB Tomorrow > >On that note, >I wanted to see a high level statement including: > >Ontology for the uniform representation of any framework or >standard with result that an organization can align to >multiple frameworks and standards as required by their >industry and core department function. > >I'm not entirely sure if this is my mission, or the group mission. > >I wrote about this in the www.pbandsp.com/PMMR paper. The >footnotes and comments deal with my thoughts on the subject. > >Regarding Sarah's comment on the share IP, this is an area of >tremendous concern for me. > >Regarding the proposal from Jamie, I mentioned in the meeting >that the changes felt appropriate to me. I don't want my >views to hold up progress. >I don't feel we should alter the presentation of the charter. > > >Robin > >-----Original Message----- >From: Cummins, Fred A [mailto:fred.cummins@eds.com] >Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 12:52 PM >To: Sarah Barbuscia; dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org >Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML >charter due by EOB Tomorrow > >Sarah, > >The charter looks generally okay, but > >- the Statement of Purpose talks about a "data model" and the >deliverables talks about a "taxonomy." It should be a data >model, and, furthermore, it should be based on CIM or we >should know why not. This provides consistency among the real >deliverable(s) of this effort and others. > >- the "real" deliverables should be the XML document >specifications for communication of configuration >transactions, i.e., what documents are exchanged to support >configuration management processes. > >Fred > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Sarah Barbuscia [mailto:SBarbuscia@inventures.com] >>Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 6:45 PM >>To: dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org >>Cc: jamie.clark@oasis-open.org >>Subject: [dcml-frame] REMINDER: Comments on the DCML charter >due by EOB >>Tomorrow >> >> >>Reminder: >> >>As discussed on Tuesday's teleconference, any comments on the TC >>charter are due to the mail list by EOD tomorrow, February 10, 2006. >> >>Sarah >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org] >>Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:28 PM >>To: dcml-frame@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: [dcml-frame] Proposed text of charter clarification ballot >> >> Would you please review the attached revisions that I've >received >>as >>proposed amendments to the DCML Framework TC charter. >(There are two >>identical documents attached here, in two formats, each >marked to show >>changes from the current approved text.) Among other things, >> -- As you've discussed, these would rename the TC as the "DCML >>Configuration Management TC." >> -- These changes anticipate the practical equivalent of merging >>the Apps & Services TC into this one. >> -- New target dates should be inserted for the proposed >clarified >>list of deliverables. >> >> If adopted this would qualify as a "charter clarification" under >>the OASIS TC Process. We can launch the ballot (as a web >ballot on the >>TC's >>site) to approve it as soon as the new target dates are >filled in, and >>we incorporate any consensual corrections to the proposal. >> Best regards JBC >> >>~ James Bryce Clark >>~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS >>~ jamie.clark@oasis-open.org >> >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]