RE: [dita-adoption] Thoughts on DITA 1.2 adoption

["Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joann Hackos [mailto:joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com]
> Sent: Monday, 2010 August 02 9:14
> To: DITA Adoption TC
> Subject: [dita-adoption] Thoughts on DITA 1.2 adoption
> 
> Hi All!
> At today's meeting could we discuss developing a basic list of DITA
1.2
> features that we would like to see adopted by editing and content
> management developers?

I'm not sure I understand.

Which features do we NOT want to see adopted by editing
and content management developers?

paul

> 
> In asking about DITA 1.2 adoption in writing the status article, I got
> such diverse feedback from developers that I would like to have a
> standard list.
> 
> Specializations
> Learning and Training
> Safety Hazard
> Machine Industry
> 
> Keyref
> Conkeyref
> Conref Push
> Delayed conref resolution
> 
> Referencing a range of elements
> 
> Constraint mechanism
> Controlled values
> Taxonomy mechanism
> Acronym/glossary
> 
> New linking capabilities in relationship tables
> 
> All the new DTD capabilities such as
> <sectiondiv>
> <bodydiv>
> New map references
> 
> I'd like to set something up that is like a checklist that vendors can
> go to and tell everyone what they have implemented (or the dates for
> implementation).
> 
> JoAnn