RE: [dita-adoption] Feedback on the "Convenience elements" feature article

["Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>]

I'm not sure if Kris meant there was something wrong in the spec

or something in the article that didn't agree with the spec, but

see PTC comments at

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-adoption/201108/msg00004.html

 

paul

 

From: Bruce Nevin (bnevin) [mailto:bnevin@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, 2011 August 15 10:01
To: Kristen Eberlein; DITA Adoption TC
Subject: RE: [dita-adoption] Feedback on the "Convenience elements" feature article

 

I’ll see if I can add some tutorial content this week.

 

What, specifically, do you think is incorrect in the spec?

 

                /B

 

From: Kristen Eberlein [mailto:keberlein@sdl.com]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 10:12 AM
To: DITA Adoption TC
Subject: [dita-adoption] Feedback on the "Convenience elements" feature article

 

Whenever possible, I think we should try to include tutorial type content in these feature articles. I don’t think that this article accomplishes that, especially in regard to the information concerning the <topicset> and <topicsetref> elements. The code examples pretty much just are a repeat of the content in the DITA 1.2 spec.

 

A further problem here is that I think that some of the DITA 1.2 spec content might be wrong … L

 

Best regards,

Kris