Hi
again,
I
should mention that I’m not entirely sure if the lack of @format, @scope, or
@type attributes was the problem. I was able to generate working HTML output
with both the old and the new versions, and I wasn’t able to generate PDF
output at all with either version.
Su-Laine
From: Su-Laine Yeo
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 4:39 PM
To: 'Kristen James Eberlein'; dita-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [dita-comment] Issues with DITA 1.2 CD03: Obsolete file and
broken cross-references
Hi
Kris,
The
c-terminology.dita file is fine; the terminology file with the broken xrefs is
archspec/dita-terminology.dita . I’ve attached a copy of this file, in which I
believe I’ve fixed the xrefs. These xrefs didn’t have @format, @scope, or @type
attributes on them. I added all three attributes to all three xrefs in the
file, and can generate working HTML output from the file on my machine.
Thanks
for fixing the others.
Su-Laine
Su-Laine Yeo
Solutions
Consultant
JustSystems
Canada, Inc.
Office:
778-327-6356
syeo@justsystems.com
www.justsystems.com
XMetaL Community Forums: http://forums.xmetal.com/
From: Kristen James Eberlein
[mailto:kris@eberleinconsulting.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:46 PM
To: dita-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [dita-comment] Issues with DITA 1.2 CD03: Obsolete file and
broken cross-references
The
problems with the obsolete file are fixed. I have completed the following
actions:
- Deleted
keyref.dita
- Corrected
<xref> element in archspec/topicorientation.dita ("2.1.2.1.2.1
Disciplined, topic-oriented writing")
- Corrected
<xref> element in common/new-in_1_2.dita ("Appendix B.1.1
Changes from DITA 1.1 to DITA 1.2" )
- Corrected
<xref> element in archspec/ditalinking.dita ("2.1.3.3 DITA
linking" )
- Corrected
<link> and conref'd <p> element in thekeysattribute.dita
("3.4.2.2 The keys attribute")
I could not find any cross
references to keyref.dita in c-terminology.dita ("2.1.1.2 DITA terminology
and notation"). I both scanned the file and then used Book Structure
Viewer to verify that the only <xref> elements that it contains point to
locations internal to c-terminology.dita.
I transformed dita1.2-complete.ditamap and confirmed that it ran without
errors.
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
Secretary, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Charter member, OASIS DITA Adoption Committee
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
>From the attached report, it looks like we need to fix <xref>s in the
following topics:
- p. 17 and 18 "2.1.1.2 DITA terminology and notation"
- p. 24 "2.1.2.1.2.1 Disciplined, topic-oriented writing"
- p. 52 "2.1.3.3 DITA linking"
- p. 1203 "Appendix B.1.1 Changes from DITA 1.1 to DITA 1.2"
We might also want to delete the keyref.dita file so that people don't
accidentally link to it in future.