Re: [dita-comment] @id attribute on Learning2 elements

["Robert D Anderson" <robander@us.ibm.com>]

Hi Julio,

I've double checked with Eliot Kimber and John Hunt from the learning subcommittee, and confirmed that this general issue is the same thing I mentioned in response to your comment on lcSequencing2. All of the elements that show a required @id attribute had the required attribute in the old learning domain, but this was relaxed in the learning2 domain. The examples for the new elements (not using @id) are correct, and the attribute descriptions should be updated to match the more relaxed model in the grammar files.

Thanks for catching this -

Robert D Anderson
IBM Authoring Tools Development
Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit (http://www.dita-ot.org/)

"Julio Vazquez" ---08/05/2015 08:25:02---Please review which elements truly require the @id attribute and remove this attribute from those el

From: "Julio Vazquez" <jvazquez@vasont.com>
To: <dita-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 08/05/2015 08:25
Subject: [dita-comment] @id attribute on Learning2 elements

---

Please review which elements truly require the @id attribute and remove this attribute from those elements that don’t require it.
 
Julio J. Vazquez
Senior Content Analyst
Vasont Systems 
A TransPerfect Company 
Skype: tpt_jvazquez
 
+1 717-793-3895
www.vasont.com
The information in this email is confidential and intended for those to whom it is addressed.