[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: 26 Oct 2006 Minutes
The minutes have been posted. They are repeated here for your convenience. Best wishes, Bruce Esrig ============ DITA Learning Content SC Meeting minutes Date: Thursday, 26 October 2006 Time: 11:00am - 12:00pm ET Minutes by Bruce Esrig Agenda: 1) Roll-call, welcome, and introduction of new members, observers, and guests 2) Review and approval of the minutes. [ No quorum, so this was deferred. ] See http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20768/learningSCmeeting061012.txt and http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20769/learningSCmeeting061019.txt 3) Business a) Announcements - JoAnn to speak at upcoming online forum on e- Learning. b) Status check and planning next steps. Karen Ziech: what is the significance of a decision? John Hunt: The subcommittee prepares information to submit to the DITA TC. After review, the information gets proposed by the DITA TC to the OASIS community. Karen Z: What is our definition of a learning object? We write in order to support the work that people do. John Hunt: Suggest another bullet item for working assumptions, perhaps. Karen: Would we want to call the result a performance object? Paul Barley: Would the term "performance" interfere with the idea of gaining conceptual info, such as a methodology? Karen Z: The learning is for the purpose of performing something. Julia Cronin: We do task analysis. We analyze what you do, and what you need to know in order to do that. Workflows link back to the requisite knowledge. John Hunt: The results of a side discussion (Karen Z, Paul Barley, Julia C) could help strengthen the working assumptions. Action item: Karen Ziech will convene a discussion on revising the working assumptions. Discussion of the strawman proposals in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-learningspec/200610/msg00013.html * (Proposal 1) Do we have general consensus on a top-level model? * (Proposal 2) Can we state an initial set of information types for RIOs and structures for organizing them? Greg Devore: How does nesting work? Greg: How to represent reusable learning objects. Bruce Esrig: The DITA convention is to use maps for organizing and to use topics for containing information to deliver. Paul B: We are not prevented from nesting topics; it's a choice. Julia C: Could you use metadata to specify that certain content is detailed? John Hunt: various ways to enable level of detail that is exposed. Paul Barley: Could make exposure of information a programming feature. * (Proposal 3) Develop a DITA map domain to define a set of specialized DITA topicref elements, structured and sequenced to represent the specific topic types used for a learning object. John Hunt: Refer to Design patterns for information architecture with DITA map domains, http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-dita7/ You can define a set of specialized elements that can be used across a set of map domains. Can define a learning object that can be included in a wide variety of maps, not just in a learning map. * (Proposal 4) We can define a specific map type specifically for organizing content into lessons, modules, and courses. Greg: This one seems well-accepted. [ For proposals 5 and 6: ] * Can we prioritize processing and deliverable targets (such as ILT, web, e-learning, SCORM)? * Can we develop an action plan for making decisions about SCORM, navigation/sequencing, and QTI interactions? * (Proposal 5) Align with SCORM as a delivery target J Hunt: Defines a packaging model and a processing model. A SCORM package is a ZIP file that contains a SCORM manifest file and a package of content (typically HTML). The manifest points to the content in various places, and it's possible to specify various forms of interaction. Greg: A learning management system would be able to open and run packages that are developed in DITA. J Hunt: A small set of minimal requirements. Launch a session and close a session. Further optional features on how to track progress. We would need to determine what level of detail to align with. * (Proposal 6) Align with QTI Mentioned but not discussed. At 07:39 PM 10/26/2006, esrig-ia@esrig.com wrote: >The document named 26 Oct 2006 Minutes (learningSCmeeting061026.txt) has >been submitted by Bruce Esrig to the DITA Learning and Training Content >Specialization SC document repository. > >Document Description: > > >View Document Details: >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita-learningspec/document.php?document_id=20892 > >Download Document: >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita-learningspec/download.php/20892/learningSCmeeting061026.txt > > >PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application >may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste >the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. > >-OASIS Open Administration
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]