[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita-learningspec] A naming convention for learning contentelements
I like lc, too! --Scott John Accardi wrote: > Yes, I like "lc" > > John > > Reuben Tozman wrote: >> >> How about just using ‘lc’? Even shorter J >> >> Reuben Tozman >> >> Director, edCetra Training >> >> T: 416.530.5890 >> >> C: 416.991.5368 >> >> F: 416.915.0875 >> >> Visit us on the web at www.edcetratraining.com >> <http://www.edcetratraining.com> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* john_hunt@us.ibm.com [mailto:john_hunt@us.ibm.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2007 10:12 AM >> *To:* dita-learningspec@lists.oasis-open.org >> *Subject:* [dita-learningspec] A naming convention for learning >> content elements >> >> >> Hi DITA learning SC - >> >> This repeats a 10May agenda item, but I wanted to get wider >> distribution to the email list, for responses and discussion. >> >> To avoid naming collisions with other DITA elements, including future >> or private specializations, we might want to consider using a >> standard prefix for all of our element names. >> >> If so, we need something short and sweet. >> >> For example, how about ltc, for "learning training content" ? >> >> Our element names would end up like: >> >> * ltcObjectives >> * ltcIntro >> * ltcDuration >> * ltcResources >> >> >> What do you think? >> >> John Hunt >> >> > -- * Scott Hudson* / XML Business Architect/ scott.hudson@FlatironsSolutions.com <mailto:scott.hudson@FlatironsSolutions.com> O: 303.542.2146 C: 303.332.1883 F: 303.544.0522 www.FlatironsSolutions.com <http://www.flatironssolutions.com/> / An Inc. 500 Company/ / /
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]