Re: [dita-learningspec] Proposal: New Base Class for all L&TInteraction Elements

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com>]

On 7/17/09 10:35 AM, "john_hunt@us.ibm.com" <john_hunt@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Eliot,
> 
> I think the proposal has good merit, and can see the need for a common
> base for additional interaction specializers.
> 
> If I understand correctly:
> 
> * Specializers could add entire new interactions from this base, while
> keeping the interactions within the global set defined by
> lcInteractionBase.
> 
> * Specializers could also specialize from learningDomain if they want to
> use elements already defined there, such as lcFeedback, etc.

Your understanding is correct.
 
> Do I correctly conclude that there is no need to include elements such as
> ldFeedback in the base?

Ah, are you saying push the feedback types down into base since they are
common across the interaction types?

Yes, that makes sense--should have thought of that.

Cheers,

E.
----
Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
email:  ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com>
office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368
2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403
www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com>  | http://blog.reallysi.com
<http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>