OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita-machine-industry message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: Regret notice


Jonathan,

Very well described I must say..however let me add a couple of comments see
belwo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonatan Lundin [mailto:Jonatan.Lundin@citec.com]
> Sent: 8. juni 2010 14:48
> To: Keld Jellesen; christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch; dita-machine-
> industry@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Regret notice
> 
> Hi,
> I cannot participate in todays meeting.
> 
> With reference to Kelds mail below: As I have understood it RDS is a
> system where you can identify and reference an unique physical object
> (from 3 topological aspects) within, for example, a power plant. This
> means that you can build a representation of the plant as a hierarchy
> of objects (and the relations between objects?). I can see a need to be
> able to categorize what objects a topic is related to/describes. This
> is needed for filtering or retrieval purposes.
[KJE:] The basic standard ISO 81346 actually allows to have 4 topological
aspects. Your ? about relations the code within one topology will not define
relations, but between the different topologies you will find relations.
> 
> The new subject scheme feature in DITA 1.2 could be used to address
> this issue (as you see I'm a big fan of this feature).  Each unique
> object in the RDS is "registered" as a subject in the scheme map. Then
> the RDS for a specific plant could be seen as a taxonomy. Further more
> a classification map could be used to relate DITA topics the a subject
> with in the scheme.
[KJE:] I need to dive into this. Currently I have made a specialization for
the RDS-code based upon the props attribute (we're still in 1.1 though)
> 
> One problem with the subject scheme feature of DITA 1.2, as I see it,
> is the fact that you can classify a DITA topic using the topicmeta part
> and then do the same thing using a subject scheme, where there are no
> coordination. In fact you can state one thing in the topicmeta, but
> state contradictory data in your classification map.
> 
> We surely need to look into this from our work group. The subject
> scheme feature is primarely intended to define ENUMs to not hardcode
> them in a DTD, but the sheme can also be used to represent the subjects
> a topic is describing, for example parts or objects/products in a
> machine or plant. I'm planning to give some more input which is also
> related to the ditatoctemp proposal and the filtering proposal.
[KJE:] I look forward to that. I have developed a database for the
power-plant industry RDS-PP where the different parties are able to work and
coordinate together their individual codes. The database I'm currently
moving into the "cloud".

/Keld 

> Br,
> Jonatan
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Keld Jellesen [keld.jellesen@advice2u.dk]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:47 PM
> To: christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch; dita-machine-industry@lists.oasis-
> open.org
> Subject: RE: [dita-machine-industry] Groups - DITA Machine Industry SC
> Meeting modified
> 
> I thing we need to address a RDS system with DITA-Machinery SC. RDS is
> Reference Designation System and is used in various places for example
> the energy sector. The overall foundation for this is the ISO-81346,
> which is quite abstract. However VGB have developed a solution called
> RDS-PP (Power Plant) which is a concrete suggestion to build a RDS
> system for the wind energy sector. It is in close family with KKS which
> I can imagine will be included in the RDS-PP for the future.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Keld
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch
> > [mailto:christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch]
> > Sent: 25. maj 2010 16:08
> > To: dita-machine-industry@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [dita-machine-industry] Groups - DITA Machine Industry SC
> > Meeting modified
> >
> > Unfortunatley the conference call has not been activated for us. If
> it
> > is not getting activated till quarter past, we will switch to the
> > alternative calling number:
> >
> > +1 218 486 8700
> >
> > Passcode: 185771
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Chris
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]