[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Regret notice
Jonathan, Very well described I must say..however let me add a couple of comments see belwo > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonatan Lundin [mailto:Jonatan.Lundin@citec.com] > Sent: 8. juni 2010 14:48 > To: Keld Jellesen; christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch; dita-machine- > industry@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Regret notice > > Hi, > I cannot participate in todays meeting. > > With reference to Kelds mail below: As I have understood it RDS is a > system where you can identify and reference an unique physical object > (from 3 topological aspects) within, for example, a power plant. This > means that you can build a representation of the plant as a hierarchy > of objects (and the relations between objects?). I can see a need to be > able to categorize what objects a topic is related to/describes. This > is needed for filtering or retrieval purposes. [KJE:] The basic standard ISO 81346 actually allows to have 4 topological aspects. Your ? about relations the code within one topology will not define relations, but between the different topologies you will find relations. > > The new subject scheme feature in DITA 1.2 could be used to address > this issue (as you see I'm a big fan of this feature). Each unique > object in the RDS is "registered" as a subject in the scheme map. Then > the RDS for a specific plant could be seen as a taxonomy. Further more > a classification map could be used to relate DITA topics the a subject > with in the scheme. [KJE:] I need to dive into this. Currently I have made a specialization for the RDS-code based upon the props attribute (we're still in 1.1 though) > > One problem with the subject scheme feature of DITA 1.2, as I see it, > is the fact that you can classify a DITA topic using the topicmeta part > and then do the same thing using a subject scheme, where there are no > coordination. In fact you can state one thing in the topicmeta, but > state contradictory data in your classification map. > > We surely need to look into this from our work group. The subject > scheme feature is primarely intended to define ENUMs to not hardcode > them in a DTD, but the sheme can also be used to represent the subjects > a topic is describing, for example parts or objects/products in a > machine or plant. I'm planning to give some more input which is also > related to the ditatoctemp proposal and the filtering proposal. [KJE:] I look forward to that. I have developed a database for the power-plant industry RDS-PP where the different parties are able to work and coordinate together their individual codes. The database I'm currently moving into the "cloud". /Keld > Br, > Jonatan > > ________________________________________ > From: Keld Jellesen [keld.jellesen@advice2u.dk] > Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:47 PM > To: christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch; dita-machine-industry@lists.oasis- > open.org > Subject: RE: [dita-machine-industry] Groups - DITA Machine Industry SC > Meeting modified > > I thing we need to address a RDS system with DITA-Machinery SC. RDS is > Reference Designation System and is used in various places for example > the energy sector. The overall foundation for this is the ISO-81346, > which is quite abstract. However VGB have developed a solution called > RDS-PP (Power Plant) which is a concrete suggestion to build a RDS > system for the wind energy sector. It is in close family with KKS which > I can imagine will be included in the RDS-PP for the future. > > Best Regards > > Keld > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch > > [mailto:christian.kravogel@seicodyne.ch] > > Sent: 25. maj 2010 16:08 > > To: dita-machine-industry@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [dita-machine-industry] Groups - DITA Machine Industry SC > > Meeting modified > > > > Unfortunatley the conference call has not been activated for us. If > it > > is not getting activated till quarter past, we will switch to the > > alternative calling number: > > > > +1 218 486 8700 > > > > Passcode: 185771 > > > > Best regards > > > > Chris > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]