[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Groups - Action Item Closed: #0080 Verify support for defining acce...
DITA Semiconductor Information Design SC member, Bob Beims has closed this action item. Number: #0080 Description: Verify support for defining acce... Owner: Tom Cihak Status: Closed Due: 27 May 2009 Comments: Bob Beims 2009-05-14 15:55 GMT Comment from Draft 3 p. 78. bitFieldPropset. Is the bitFieldAccess field required? We don't always identify the access type at the bit level. >> ACTION: verify that the data model fully supports both use cases (specify access for all fields at the register level, or specify / override access at the bit field level). Bob Beims 2009-05-27 15:31 GMT per 2009-05-27 teleconference discussion: Tom has verified that in Freescale's implementation, the processing pipeline supports access type specification only at the register level. However, Freescale has a plan to eventually support bitField level specification, too, and sees no limitation in the data model to prevent this. View Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita-sidsc/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=2692 Referenced Items Date Name Type ---- ---- ---- 2009-05-12 ditaref-sidsc-book-d-090512-review.pdfReference Document 2009-03-14 ditaref-sidsc-book.pdf Reference Document PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser. - OASIS Open Administration
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]