dita-sidsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: ST questions from 2009-06-24 telecon
- From: "Beims Bob-RWBC70" <bob.beims@freescale.com>
- To: "Semiconductor Information Design Subcommittee" <dita-sidsc@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:11:25 -0700
Sheila;
If we can continue this dialog via email, that would be
great!
Regards,
Bob
Hi
Bob,
Here is
a summary of the points I raised in yesterday's meeting.
1. SIDSC
specializations and output processing
Can someone who has not
used the SIDSC specializations, and more importantly who has not developed a
stylesheet to process them, take SIDSC DITA, do the output processing
with the DITA OT (or their own DITA stylesheet) and get the output to make
sense?
If the answer is no, then
have we not lost one of the fundamental benefits of using DITA -
compatibility with anyone else using DITA?
Is it good enough that the
compatibility stops at interpreting the XML and does not cover the output
processing?
2. What is the
purpose of the SIDSC specializations?
Considering that
the SIDSC data model is rather heavy, what is it's objective?
Is it designed to be more
than a documentation XML? Are all the additional tags really necessary to
create a semiconductor datasheet?
How much longer does it
take to tag with the specializations compared to standard DITA? What are the benefits of using the
specialization, particularly for a company who already uses IP-XACT?
Regards
Sheila
SIDSC
members;
My apologies ...
today's telecon discussion was really good, and really important to capture for
those who could not attend. Unfortunately, this was the first time I'd attempted
to use Live Meeting 2007 to record the session, and I missed the
second click required to start the
recording.
So, we have no
recording, and without a secretary, we have no notes. Hmmm... we'll have to
count on email recollections to recover from my ineptitude.
Regards,
Bob
This e-mail, and any associated attachments have been classified as:
Public
Freescale Semiconductor Internal Use
Only
Freescale Semiconductor
Confidential Proprietary
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]