I think this is a good starting point. Thanks for taking the time
to start work on a prototype, Bob.
I think the first places to begin work are the following:
- Restructure the element reference topics to follow the
template established for the DITA 2.0 spec. This will highlight
material that is inappropriate -- or material that really needs
to be addressed in conceptual topics.
- Investigate whether any of these topics include normative
statements.
- Remove unnecessary levels of nesting, most of which are
artifacts of generating an all-inclusive edition.
- Figure out what exactly needs conceptual topics. I think most
of the conceptual (old arch spec) topics about document types
are pretty useless.
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
On 8/20/2017 12:46 AM, Bob Thomas
wrote:
Hi,
The attached PDF is my first attempt to pull the technical
content in the DITA 1.3 specification into a separate
specification. The cover, the filename, and the front matter
are simply wrong so there's no need to comment on that. Please
also ignore any errata flagging artifacts. The primary purpose
of this PDF is to show how this publication will be
structured. With that in mind, there's no need to read the
content in detail. Simply look at what's there and what isn't
and then share your thoughts.
Best regards,
--
Bob
Thomas
+1 720 201 8260
Skype: bob.thomas.colorado
Time zone: Mountain (GMT-7)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php