[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] namespaces goals
Don Day wrote: > We've heard from two vendors who favor Erik's proposed approach to rolling > out namespaces for DITA. If you have an application that requires a > namespace declaration in order to function properly, please respond as to > whether you can live with the proposal. XIRUSS-T must have at least a namespace declaration for the class attribute in order to be able to provide generic DITA awareness (that is, there must be at least one DITA-specific namespace declared somewhere in a document instance in order to be able to recognize it as a DITA document). I believe the Microsoft Word requires a namespace (and a schema) on the document element in order to enable authoring. However, this second requirement can be met unilaterally and does not require action from DITA (if you accept my analysis as presented elsewhere). Cheers, E. -- W. Eliot Kimber Professional Services Innodata Isogen 9390 Research Blvd, #410 Austin, TX 78759 (512) 372-8122 eliot@innodata-isogen.com www.innodata-isogen.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]