Re: [dita] otherprops syntax - should we specify?

[Christopher Wong <cwong@idiominc.com>]

Michael Priestley wrote:

Just wanted to start the discussion on the list. For background, take a look at the conditional processing topic in the current draft of the spec.

It doesn't look like we have much movement, decision-wise, on this topic. Maybe we would have a decision if we had something to decide on. Would it help if someone like Michael post an otherprops spec proposal and sample XML so some people can start to form some yea-or-nay opinions?

Chris