RE: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.1 Issue #20 (IssueNumber20.html) uploaded

["Chris Wong" <cwong@idiominc.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Grosso [mailto:pgrosso@arbortext.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:04 PM
> To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.1 Issue #20 (IssueNumber20.html)
> uploaded
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mpriestl@ca.ibm.com [mailto:mpriestl@ca.ibm.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, 2005 July 25 18:52
> > To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.1 Issue #20 (IssueNumber20.html) uploaded
> > ...
> > The document named DITA 1.1 Issue #20 (IssueNumber20.html) has been
> > submitted by Michael Priestley to the OASIS Darwin Information Typing
> > Architecture (DITA) TC document repository.
> > 
> > Document Description:
> > Extensible metadata attributes for conditional processing (includes
> > proposal to make all attributes specializable)
...
> 
> I'm interested in this issue, but I'm unclear on the status.
> 
> The above document outlines the issue, but not the proposed
> solution, right?

I second Paul's request. I would very much like to see a concrete proposal. I'd also like to hear some clarification on why adding attributes is OK for metadata attributes but not in the general case.

Chris