[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] On the DITAVAL file
Hi Chris, Many of our users in IBM are using all parts of the DITAVAL file. Most projects seem to use revision markers in some way (whether for final output, or simply to generate output for reviews), and flagging is commonly used to highlight items that are of interest only to a given platform. For instance, when one paragraph applies to using a product on Linux, and the next paragraph applies to Windows, this is used to insert a small graphic to highlight which is which. The DITAVAL format allows for alternate text to make these images accessible. I'm not sure how much Erik's proposal for style policies could or would take over these functions - he'll probably have to speak to that. Robert D Anderson IBM Authoring Tools Development Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit "Chris Wong" <cwong@idiominc.c om> To "DITA-TC \(E-mail\)" 01/31/2006 11:22 <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> AM cc Subject [dita] On the DITAVAL file What do we want to accomplish with the DITAVAL file? I see it as useful for specifying deliverable content, much like a DITA map, but this is only the filtering part of the file. When we (Idiom) discussed supporting DITAVAL, it just seemed overengineered when all people were asking for was conditional text. Nobody was requesting flagging nor revision marking. Is anyone using the revprops part of DITAVAL? Or flagging? These parts determine appearance, not content. I'm just trying to get a handle on the different applications of DITAVAL. Chris
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]