[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Congratulations and next steps
I started work on a Roadmap document that starts to organize how this and
subsequent releases might look, and tried to apply Erik's suggestions to
this admittedly outline-level view of things. I think we can develop more
specific messages or other documents once we agree on the roadmap discourse
and the links provided for it. I welcome your comments on how this is
shaping up:
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/Roadmap_for_DITA_development#preview
Regards,
--
Don Day
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
IBM Lead DITA Architect
Email: dond@us.ibm.com
11501 Burnet Rd. MS9033E015, Austin TX 78758
Phone: +1 512-838-8550
T/L: 678-8550
"Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"
--T.S. Eliot
Erik
Hennum/Oakland/IB
M@IBMUS To
"Paul Prescod"
02/21/2006 05:32 <paul.prescod@blastradius.com>
PM cc
dita@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject
Re: [dita] Congratulations and next
steps
Hi, Paul:
Maybe we could distill the new DITA 1.1 features to two main themes:
* Book deliverables (bookmap / bookinfo, shortdesc enhancement, indexing
enhancements, graphic scaling)
* Data extensibility (extensible metadata attributes, <data> element,
<unknown> element for foreign vocabularies)
Would that support crisp messages along the lines you suggest below?
Erik Hennum
ehennum@us.ibm.com
PS. With the universal attributes sweeping up after the crowd.
"Paul Prescod" <paul.prescod@blastradius.com> wrote on 02/21/2006 09:46:08
AM:
> I think that the DITA 1.1 focus on books could lead to much broader
> adoption of DITA. I hadn't really thought about the bundle of features
> as a theme but it is a great idea.
>
> I would suggest the following next steps:
>
> * publicize the "New 1.1" proposal as quickly as possible in case there
> is any community disagreement about it
>
> * publish each individual proposal or design to get community feedback
>
> * perhaps have "information sessions" where we bring TC members (and
> perhaps others) up to speed on each of the proposal bundles so that we
> can contribute effectively on each
>
> * if there are any proposals that seem controversial or difficult to
> complete, consider postponing those
>
> * set a deadline for design completion of the proposals
>
> Other thoughts?
>
> Paul Prescod
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]