RE: [dita] RE: latest 1.1 XSDs

["Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>]

OK, other than the comments, I guess there isn't a problem
with the XSDs.

Yes, we were getting errors, but now we're suspecting it's
probably a xerces-c bug.

Trying to validate using java xerces, a sample dita topic 
validated without error against the XSDs.

With xerces-c standalone, we got errors about redefined elements. 

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Sirois [mailto:esirois@ca.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, 2006 November 27 10:25
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [dita] RE: latest 1.1 XSDs
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> The redefine was purposefully left like that so as not to 
> break existing
> specialization when the base DITA 1.0 schema were switched
> for the DITA 1.1 schemas.    The commonElementGrp.xsd is 
> included in the
> topicGrp.xsd so the parser should not be returning an error.
> 
> Which XML parser are you using?  I've tried validation with 
> Xerces and XSV.
> Neither of them returned errors.  I haven't tried SaxonSA.
> I know there are also some validation issues with some of the MS XML
> parser.
> 
> Eric
> Eric A. Sirois
>                                                               
>              
>              "Grosso, Paul"                                   
>              
>              <pgrosso@ptc.com>                                
>              
>                                                               
>           To 
>              11/27/2006 10:40          Eric 
> Sirois/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA       
>              AM                                               
>           cc 
>                                        
> <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>         
>                                                               
>      Subject 
>                                        [dita] RE: latest 1.1 
> XSDs          
>                                                               
> 
> 
> 
> Maybe I'm confused, but topic.xsd has:
> 
>   <xs:redefine schemaLocation="topicGrp.xsd">
>     <xs:group name="keyword">
>       <xs:choice>
>         <xs:group ref="keyword"/>
>         <xs:group ref="pr-d-keyword" />
>         <xs:group ref="ui-d-keyword" />
>         <xs:group ref="sw-d-keyword" />
>       </xs:choice>
>     </xs:group>
> 
>     . . .
> 
> but keyword is no longer defined in topicGrp.xsd, but is in
> commonElementGrp.xsd.  This was giving me schema errors.
> 
> If I change the <xs:redefine schemaLocation="topicGrp.xsd">
> to read <xs:redefine schemaLocation="commonElementGrp.xsd">
> and add a line <xs:include schemaLocation="topicGrp.xsd"/>
> just before the xs:redefine that was changed, I can load a
> sample DITA document that uses a schema without error.  I did
> this for topic.xsd.  There are similar issues for each of the
> DITA topic types.
> 
> (And the misleading comments are problematic.  We are trying
> to finalize our release, and we don't feel it's proper to have
> clearly misleading documentation in released files.)
> 
> paul
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric Sirois [mailto:esirois@ca.ibm.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 2006 November 27 09:29
> > To: Grosso, Paul
> > Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: Re: latest 1.1 XSDs
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Yes, those are the latest ones. It includes the latest 
> updates to the
> > indexterm elements (start and end attributes).
> > I believe that it was the last time the TC approved updates to the
> > DTD/Schemas...but I could be mistaken.
> >
> > The file topicGrp.xsd is included in the zip and it is still
> > being used.
> > Most of the content of topicGrp.xsd was moved
> > over to commonElementGrp.xsd.  Are you having trouble validating the
> > schemas?
> >
> > I can update the comments, copyrights, etc. to DITA 1.1.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Eric
> >
> > Eric A. Sirois
> > Staff Software Developer
> > DB2 Universal Database - Information Development
> > DITA Migration and Tools Development
> > IBM Canada Ltd. - Toronto Software Lab
> > Email: esirois@ca.ibm.com
> > Blue Pages (Internal)
> >
> > "Transparency and accessibility requirements dictate that public
> > information and government
> > transactions avoid depending on technologies that imply or impose a
> > specific product or
> > platform on businesses or citizens" - EU on XML-based 
> office document
> > formats.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >              "Grosso, Paul"
> >
> >              <pgrosso@ptc.com>
> >
> >
> >           To
> >              11/27/2006 10:07
> > <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>, Eric
> >              AM
> > Sirois/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
> >
> >           cc
> >
> >
> >
> >      Subject
> >                                        latest 1.1 XSDs
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Are the latest DITA 1.1 XSD's those posted on 2006 Sep 5 at
> > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/download.php
> > /20143/dit
> > a_xsd_1.1b.zip
> >
> > The latest change date in that set is August 30.  There
> > are files with no comments and files with comments
> > saying they are DITA 1.0.1 files.
> >
> > Some lines in topic.xsd, such as:
> >
> >  <xs:redefine schemaLocation="topicGrp.xsd">
> >
> > refer to topicGrp.xsd which is no longer in the set of xsd's.
> >
> > Does anyone have a set of XSD's for DITA 1.1 that are up to date
> > and really work?
> >
> > paul
> >
> >
> 
>