dita message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Configuration vs Specialization
- From: Michael Priestley <mpriestl@ca.ibm.com>
- To: "W. Eliot Kimber" <ekimber@innodata-isogen.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:27:24 -0500
There is a topic called "Modularization
and integration" that discusses this.
I am beginning to think that the existing
structure of the specialization section is causing some problems. It is
currently divided into three sections: content (how specialization is expressed
in XML instances), design (how specializations are created and integrated
into doctypes), and processing (how specialization-aware processes should
deal with specialized content). This structure was based on input
from the TC in the 1.0 timeframe (notably you, Eliot) but I'm concerned
that it is separating some topics that would otherwise naturally belong
together (like the various topics on attribute specialization, and now
the topics on specialization vs. integration).
That said, I'm reluctant to take up
the task of rewriting the entire section on specialization around new organizing
principles. Most of the content is there, and we might be able to get most
of what you want simply by reorganizing the topics, but I'm not sure we
should be attempting it at this point in the DITA 1.1 release.
Michael Priestley
IBM DITA Architect and Classification Schema PDT Lead
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
"W. Eliot Kimber"
<ekimber@innodata-isogen.com>
01/23/2007 02:50 PM
|
To
| <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [dita] Configuration vs Specialization |
|
The DITA declaration sets are designed to be configurable
without
otherwise changing the declarations or creating a new specialization
layer. This is alluded to in various places but I think it would be
useful to have a brief discussion of configuration, customization, and
specialization at the beginning of the specialization section that makes
the differences clear, both from a syntax and practice standpoint, and
from a conformance standpoint.
For example, in the section "What is specialization?" it would
be useful
to at that point introduce the related concepts of configuration and
customization and maybe have parallel topics on them at that level.
Cheers,
Eliot
--
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
8500 N. Mopac, Suite 402
Austin, TX 78759
(214) 954-5198
ekimber@innodata-isogen.com
www.innodata-isogen.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]