[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Numbering of Proposals
Don Day wrote: > Simple point-based subclassing works for me: > > 12047.a > 12047.b > 12047.c My implicit question was also whether or not we should be using these numbers (the numbers for the 1.2 issues) or should be continuing the simple sequence numbering used to date. I don't care, I just want to be consistent. If we use the 120** numbers, should we create new proposals with those numbers for feature requests that already have existing proposals (e.g, 12016 which is associated with proposal #43)? Cheers, E. -- W. Eliot Kimber Professional Services Innodata Isogen 8500 N. Mopac, Suite 402 Austin, TX 78759 (214) 954-5198 ekimber@innodata-isogen.com www.innodata-isogen.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]