[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Errata information added to home page
"Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote on 09/04/2007 12:11:57 PM: > However, it would be best to have a separate "Errata for DITA 1.1" > page that could be linked to from this location on our main TC page. I agree - I asked Don about setting up another page at the TC, but it looks like the only way to add pages to the main Committee page is by uploading a document or by sending an email. In that case it won't really be a permanent Errata page. One alternative was to point to a page on our Wiki, but (to me) that seemed rather too unofficial. If somebody has a suggestion of how to get a more official looking errata page at the TC, please speak up... alternatively, if others think a wiki page is appropriate, we could just do that. > By the way, are the links into our mailing list and document > archive member-only, or do they work for others? The links from the TC page are for anybody. The internal links within Eric's email are member only, because that's what the upload-document function generates. Robert D Anderson IBM Authoring Tools Development Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit (507) 253-8787, T/L 553-8787 (Good Monday & Thursday) "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote on 09/04/2007 12:11:57 PM: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert D Anderson [mailto:robander@us.ibm.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, 2007 September 04 11:30 > > To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [dita] Errata information added to home page > > > > > > Don and I put together some text about Errata for the main TC > > Home page: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita > > > > It is under the section heading Technical Work Produced by > > the Committee, > > which is where we announced the 1.0.1 bug fixes way back when. > > > > This should take care of the most immediate issue. We can update that > > section when the TC votes to approve the errata as a draft. > > We've already > > determined that we will hold off a while on trying to make an official > > OASIS-approved set of errata. > > OK for now. > > However, it would be best to have a separate "Errata for DITA 1.1" > page that could be linked to from this location on our main TC page. > > Then, in the future, any published spec should have in it a > direct link to the "Errata for DITA 1.x" page so in the future > we don't require users to troll through our TC page, and we > can augment the single errata page for new errata instead > of having to edit the TC page each time. And we can keep > the date on the errata page up-to-date so someone can easily > tell if they've seen the latest errata list. > > By the way, are the links into our mailing list and document > archive member-only, or do they work for others? I don't seem > to have a good way to tell myself. > > paul
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]