[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Behavior of <q> element
Hi Robert, Since <q> is based on the XHTML spec, I think it's fitting to suggest an implementation the way they do. In all projects I've been involved with, I have insisted that the stylesheets render the quotation marks, and that the authors must not insert them. This makes them portable to other locales, and reduces the authoring workload. I'm in favor of using the W3C wording for this element. Regards, Gershon -----Original Message----- From: Robert D Anderson [mailto:robander@us.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 5:44 PM To: dita Subject: [dita] Behavior of <q> element Hello, Going through the review comments to the specification, I found that somebody asked for examples of how <q> should be processed. Generally, we try to stay away from processing behaviors, but this one may be an exception. The current description gives no suggestions as to whether or not quotes should be generated. I checked the HTML 4.01 specification to see what they say; that specification says that q must be rendered with quotations, and that users should not add their own quotes. It goes on to say that the quotes should be rendered in a language-sensitive manner. See the section on rendering quotations: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/text.html#edef-Q Should we make a similar statement? I do not want to add behaviors that MUST be done without consulting the full TC, so - this is my consultation. Thanks - Robert D Anderson IBM Authoring Tools Development Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]