Re: [dita] Map structure and possible new attribute for conref pushand anchorref

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com>]

On 2/13/09 3:36 PM, "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:

> I like the distinction of being a only a resource as
> opposed to being treated normally (e.g., rendered).
> 
> So I lean toward attribute values of "resource-only"
> (or resourceonly or resourceOnly) and "normal", the
> latter being the default, of course.
> 
> For the attribute name, usage or any of those Robert
> mentions (processingrole, topicusage, topicrole) would
> be okay with me.

I think Paul's suggestion satisfies my concerns as well.

Cheers,

E.

----
Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
email:  ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com>
office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368
2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403
www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com>  | http://blog.reallysi.com
<http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>