Re: [dita] Section Div in LI?

[Robert D Anderson <robander@us.ibm.com>]

Hi - just to aid in discussion of the item, here is the proposal that was
approved Nov 13, 2007:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/25904/12021.html

The only changes were slight amendments on April 29, 2008 explicitly
calling out conbodydiv, refbodydiv, and approving the addition of
sectiondiv to other section specializations:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200804/msg00102.html

Robert D Anderson
IBM Authoring Tools Development
Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit

Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com> wrote on 05/26/2009 09:43:35 AM:
> [dita] Section Div in LI?
>
> On Friday, in the context of designing a new specialization for a client,
I
> noticed that section-div is not allowed within li.
>
> I'm not sure what the finally-approved proposal said but it was certainly
my
> intent/assumption that section-div would be allowed essentially anywhere
<p>
> is allowed.
>
> By that logic, I would be inclined to argue that the lack of section-div
in
> li (and similar elements, e.g., dd, etc.) is a bug. Having forgotten the
> original discussion and thinking only of the base semantics of
section-div,
> I found it surprising that it was not included in li.
>
> I'm not making a proposal at this time but would like to discuss the
issue
> to determine if it is really a bug or if the proposal as approved
explicitly
> dealt with this case.
>
> Cheers,
>
> E.
>