[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] syntax for domain usage declaration
On 9/24/09 3:21 PM, "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com> wrote: > > But my question on reading this is, having declared pr-d, why would I > want to still declare cpp-d? All the elements in cpp-d are already > available as part of pr-d, aren't they? Is the ancestry of pr-d not > recoverable from that of cpp-d? The point is that you shouldn't have look into the cpp-d module to see what it's ancestry is. This rule is parallel to the rule for the @class attribute: minimize the amount of looking about needed to determine the ancestry. Cheers, E. ---- Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc. email: ekimber@reallysi.com <mailto:ekimber@reallysi.com> office: 610.631.6770 | cell: 512.554.9368 2570 Boulevard of the Generals | Suite 213 | Audubon, PA 19403 www.reallysi.com <http://www.reallysi.com> | http://blog.reallysi.com <http://blog.reallysi.com> | www.rsuitecms.com <http://www.rsuitecms.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]