I've spent the last couple of hours
correcting build errors, looking at the draft, and reading through the
review comments on the Wiki. It made me aware that we have some "holes"
that we need to address:
- Do we have an owner for the processing
topics? None of the comments on the Wiki pages have been addressed.
Originally Nancy Harrison was responsible for the topics, then
responsibility passed to Seth Park. There is work that must be done
before the next review.
- What is the status of the
reorganization work about keys, linking, and addressing? There
are unresolved review comments here, also.
- The architectural spec does not
contain any information about the new subject scheme maps. What
material needs to be covered and where should it go?
- For the DITA 1.1 documents, the @collection-type
attribute was set to "sequence" so that next and previous links
were generated in HTML output. What was the rationale for doing this,
and do we need to repeat this pattern for the DITA 1.2 documentation?
Kris
|