[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Normative language specification
Isn’t having the DTDs be normative an OASIS rule? If so, then our
position may have been clarified for us already. So is the order of priority: DTDs, XSDs, Language Spec., Arch.
Spec? All with the hope that we don’t actually have any true conflicts. -Jeff From: Park Seth-R01164
[mailto:R01164@freescale.com] I've
been spreading rumors that the DTDs are normative when there is a conflict
between the lang spec and the DTDs. There
have been some discussions recently that clearly indicate that DTD
technology is insufficient to represent the normative language
specifications. Can
we clarify our position on this? -sp -------------------------------------------- seth
park information
architect Freescale
Semiconductor, Inc. 512.895.2463 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]