RE: [dita] Terminology issues: Grouping of terms

["Gershon Joseph (gerjosep)" <gerjosep@cisco.com>]

Hi Kris,

 

I have updated the topic to address most of this thread. The decision was to sort the items within each group alphabetically. I have updated some of the group titles based on the discussions during the TC meetings you missed. The main thing I have not done is to ensure the new terms are correctly used throughout the document, and that all old terms are removed or fixed, whichever is appropriate.

 

There is likely to still be some quibbling over the group titles, but I think I've addressed all the issues that were discussed. In some cases no-one came up with better titles, so I left the previous one or attempted to improve it.

 

--

Gershon

 

---

From: Kristen James Eberlein [mailto:kris@eberleinconsulting.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:25 AM
To: DITA TC
Subject: [dita] Terminology issues: Grouping of terms

I am reworking the Terminology topic according to the review comments and the following discussion on the TC mailing list:

• results from recent DITA 1.2 terminology discussions
  From "Ogden, Jeff" <jogden@ptc.com> on 16 Nov 2009 23:40:36 -0000
  • RE: [dita] results from recent DITA 1.2 terminology discussions
    From "Tony Self" <tself@hyperwrite.com> on 18 Nov 2009 10:57:57 -0000
    • Re: [dita] results from recent DITA 1.2 terminology discussions
      From Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com> on 18 Nov 2009 11:10:18 -0000
      • vocabulary module [was: results from recent DITA 1.2 terminology discussions]
        From "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com> on 18 Nov 2009 15:30:56 -0000
      • Re: vocabulary module [was: results from recent DITA 1.2 terminologydiscussions]
        From Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com> on 18 Nov 2009 15:34:19 -0000
      • RE: vocabulary module [was: results from recent DITA 1.2 terminology discussions]
        From "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com> on 18 Nov 2009 16:35:54 -0000
      • Re: vocabulary module [was: results from recent DITA 1.2 terminologydiscussions]
        From Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com> on 18 Nov 2009 16:38:50 -0000
      • RE: [dita] Re: vocabulary module [was: results from recent DITA 1.2 terminology discussions]
        From "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com> on 18 Nov 2009 17:13:17 -0000
   
  

Can anyone clarify for me what decision was made about how to group the terms? On the first terminology call which I chaired, we decided that Gershon would attempt to devise an ordering scheme, but that we would default to simply listing the terms in alphabetical order if the group did not come to a consensus on how to group the terms.

Was a grouping order agreed upon? Or should I simply alphabetize the terms?

Kris

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php