[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Groups - DITA 1.2 spec: CD 01, new topics to review (new-topics-for-review.chm) uploaded
OK, we're stuck with a
convention that makes it harder to distinguish the title from the other parts of
the reference. As you look further you'll see that there are some content and
markup issues in there too. For example, saying that it is a recommendation or a
working draft is more useful and informative than merely repeating the title, as
well as being an accurate quotation of the identifying information within
the cited document; the convention makes no provision for either in association
with <organization> and <date> but maybe it's allowable. There are a
few typos or mis-copies. Using & helps visually to distinguish the list
of editors from the title. It's too bad we can't put the title in quotes--or can
we? Should we use DITA markup for all these content elements? I dealt only with
the missing trademark sign, needed in order accurately to quote the title of the
XHTML recommendation.
/Bruce
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]