OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2


Hi Kris,

  Please see my earlier response. Sorry I wasn't able to respond sooner but I've had meetings all afternoon.

Regards,

Mary 



On Sep 29, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Kristen Eberlein wrote:

Hi, Kim:
 
I do not think it is appropriate to require us to include a revision history if the OASIS template officially indicates it as a optional item.  Here is a screen shot from the OASIS XHTML template at http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISSpecificationTemplateV4.1.html#AC :
 
<image002.png>
Please advise, and thanks for your help with this matter.
Best regards,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l keberlein@sdl.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
 
From: Kim Goolsby [mailto:kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 2:57 PM
To: Kristen Eberlein
Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org; mary.mcrae
Subject: Re: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2
 
Hi Kristen,
 
I asked Mary about the Revision History appendix before I sent my comments to you and she indicated that it should be included in the spec. But, regarding the blank page, that was a suggestion only. Feel free to ignore it. Mary, do you concur?
 
Best regards,

Kim

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Kristen Eberlein <keberlein@sdl.com> wrote:
Hi, Kim.
 

1.       Since the “Revision history” was indicated as optional in the OASIS template, we decided to omit it from our committee drafts. Therefore we do not want to reintroduce it at this point.

2.       I can delete page 1237 from the PDF output. However, all the pages will continue to be marked with “Page x of 1237.” I think retaining the blank page is better.

 
Thoughts? I very much appreciate your help with this matter.
Best regards,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l keberlein@sdl.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
 
From: Kim Goolsby [mailto:kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:42 PM
To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: mary.mcrae
Subject: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2
 
 
Please make the following change:
 
1. Please add a 'Revision History' appendix to this document.
2. Looking at the pdf, there is an empty page 1237 at the end of the document. I suggest removing this.
 
Thank you,
Kim

-- 
Kim Goolsby
Publications Specialist
OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society
email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org 
web: www.oasis-open.org
phone: 1.734.223.6890



-- 
Kim Goolsby
Publications Specialist
OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society
email: 
kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org 
web: 
www.oasis-open.org
phone: 1.734.223.6890



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]