[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] DITA TC meeting tomorrow (Wednesday)?
I can rearrange my schedule to show up at any point. I'm assuming the meeting will not be too long, since it is primarily just to go through the vote. Robert D Anderson IBM Authoring Tools Development Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com> wrote on 10/05/2010 03:48:38 PM: > From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@reallysi.com> > To: "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com>, dita > <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> > Date: 10/05/2010 03:54 PM > Subject: Re: [dita] DITA TC meeting tomorrow (Wednesday)? > > I am free between 10 and noon CDT and after 1:30 CDT. > > Cheers, > > E. > > On 10/5/10 2:22 PM, "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <bnevin@cisco.com> wrote: > > > Kris, > > > > It seems plain that this is what we need to do. > > > > If we need a meeting in order to rescind the 15-day review and make the > > request for a ballot, I can shift anything in my schedule tomorrowexcept one > > meeting 4-5pm ET, and another 7-9pm ET. The resolution for a 15- > day review was > > in the 9/28 meeting. > > > > /B > > > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:56 PM > >> Cc: Michael Priestley; dita@lists.oasis-open.org; Don Day (LbW) > >> Subject: > >> > >> > >> Hi Kris, > >> > >> > >> The only other thing you need to have before we can start the > CS ballot is > >> the 3 statements of use. If you can garner those in the next few hours (I > >> doubt there should be any problem other than people reading their email) > >> then > >> yes, your schedule works. > >> > >> > >> > >> Just keep me posted so I can be on high alert :) > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Mary > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Kristen Eberlein wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Obviously, I made a finger fumble and typed November in the second list > >>> item; it should be ³Thursday, 7 October 2010 Wednesday 13 > October 2010.² > >>> > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Kris > >>> > >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL > >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l > >>> keberlein@sdl.com <mailto:kduffy@sdl.comI> > >>> > >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/> > >>> > >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Kristen Eberlein [mailto:keberlein@sdl.com] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:54 PM > >>> To: Mary McRae; Michael Priestley > >>> Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org; Don Day (LbW) > >>> Subject: RE: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we > can send the > >>> DITA 1.2 spec to OASIS for a vote > >>> > >>> > >>> Mary, if we want to withdraw our request for a 15-day review and proceed > >>> with a CS approval and OS submission ballot, what would that entail? Is > >>> the > >>> following an accurate lists of necessary steps, and would you > be available > >>> to help us meet those milestones? > >>> > >>> > >>> · We rescind our motion for a 15-day review; request that OASIS > >>> sets > >>> up a ballot for us to approve a committee specification and submit the > >>> committee specification to OASIS for consideration as an OASIS standard. > >>> (We > >>> could set up an emergency meeting for tomorrow, Wednesday, 6 October to > >>> accomplish this, if necessary.) > >>> > >>> · You expedite our request and set up the ballot to run > Thursday, 7 > >>> November 2010 Wednesday 13 November 2010. > >>> > >>> · We have two days to get all supporting materials to > you; you work > >>> with us to ensure that the submission is complete. > >>> > >>> · DITA 1.2 submitted to OASIS on November 1, for vote November > >>> 16-31. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> Kris > >>> > >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL > >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l > >>> keberlein@sdl.com <mailto:kduffy@sdl.comI> > >>> > >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/> > >>> > >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:50 PM > >>> To: Michael Priestley > >>> Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org; Don Day (LbW); Kristen Eberlein > >>> Subject: Re: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we > can send the > >>> DITA 1.2 spec to OASIS for a vote > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Michael, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Package acceptance is one of the rules. All specifications > must conform to > >>> those rules, again, ensuring all OASIS specifications are uniform in > >>> appearance and contain the required content. I am sorry that the new DITA > >>> toolkit processing prepared by the TC did not include the proper notices > >>> statement, but this cannot be taken as a fault of OASIS staff. I think a > >>> four-and-a-half day turnaround (including a weekend) to move an entire > >>> office, including a network, and get the new T1 connections up and running > >>> was almost as good as we could have possibly hoped for. We are just at the > >>> seven day mark with regard to the submission for a 15 day publicreview and > >>> that includes a reprocessing on the part of the TC. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I sincerely appreciate the desire of the TC to move this as quickly as > >>> possible, and we will do everything within our power, and our > rules, to help > >>> you meet your goals. Unfortunately, that does not mean > disregarding those > >>> rules. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I am still hoping to get the public review announced today, > although time > >>> is now running short. If the TC wishes to withdraw that requestand feels > >>> that there were no substantive changes made and is instead > ready to proceed > >>> with CS approval and OS submission ballot, please let me know asap. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> All the best, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Mary > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Mary P McRae > >>> > >>> > >>> Director, Standards Development > >>> > >>> > >>> Technical Committee Administrator > >>> > >>> > >>> Member Section Administrator > >>> > >>> > >>> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society > >>> > >>> > >>> email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > >>> > >>> > >>> web: www.oasis-open.org <http://www.oasis-open.org> > >>> > >>> > >>> twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen > >>> > >>> > >>> phone: 1.603.232.9090 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Michael Priestley wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Mary, > >>> > >>>>> We have rules to ensure that each and every Technical Committee follows > >>>> the same process and there is no favoritism. "Bending" the > rules in effect > >>>> breaks them and renders them useless. > >>> > >>> I can appreciate this, but it sucks when our spec is pushed outto another > >>> year (!) because of OASIS problems with servers and package acceptance. I > >>> feel like our TC is being penalized for OASIS process and technology > >>> problems. > >>> > >>> Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) > >>> Lead IBM DITA Architect > >>> mpriestl@ca.ibm.com > >>> http://dita.xml.org/blog/25 <http://dita.xml.org/blog/25> > >>> > >>> From: > >>> Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> > >>> > >>> To: > >>> Michael Priestley/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA > >>> > >>> Cc: > >>> dita@lists.oasis-open.org, "Don Day (LbW)" > <donday@learningbywrote.com>, > >>> Kristen Eberlein <keberlein@sdl.com> > >>> > >>> Date: > >>> 10/05/2010 12:52 PM > >>> > >>> Subject: > >>> Re: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we can send the DITA > >>> 1.2 > >>> spec to OASIS for a vote > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Michael, > >>> > >>> Answers inline. > >>> > >>> Mary > >>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Michael Priestley wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Mary, > >>> > >>> We missed the deadline by only a few days, which is really unfortunate > >>> since > >>> it pushes us over a full month. > >>> > >>> There are still additional ballots to be held before the submission can > >>> take > >>> place. Post review, two ballots (which can run concurrently): approval as > >>> CS, and agreement to submit for OS ballot. Those are both 7 day > ballots and > >>> again, like most TC Admin requests, have an SLA of 7 days. We shoot for > >>> less, but that needs to be built into your timetable. > >>> > >>> Is there any room for expediting any of the following: > >>> > >>> - the current 15-day public review - is it really required? > >>> That's up to the TC. The rule is that if substantive changes are made, an > >>> additional 15-day review is required. If no further review is > required the > >>> TC can agree that no substantive changes were made and request the CS/OS > >>> ballots to be initiated. Depending on when the next TC meeting > is that may > >>> still not be completed in time for a 15 Oct deadline. Don't > forget you also > >>> need your statements of use. > >>> > >>> - the submission for voting - does it need to wait till Nov > 15th, or could > >>> it be submitted earlier, per the new process? > >>> to follow the new process you would need to instead have the 60-day > >>> Candidate OASIS Standard review. > >>> > >>> - the 15-day familiarization period - is that absolutely > required, or could > >>> it be waived, per the new process? > >>> see above. > >>> > >>> > >>> I urge everyone to read the new TC Process. It's an either/or - current > >>> section 3.4 or new section 3.4. New section 3.4 includes > statements of use > >>> explicitly referring to the Committee Specification, a 60-day review, and > >>> further confirmation before proceeding with OS ballot. > >>> > >>> We have rules to ensure that each and every Technical Committee > follows the > >>> same process and there is no favoritism. "Bending" the rules in effect > >>> breaks them and renders them useless. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Any of those options would get us back into a November timeframe for the > >>> vote. > >>> > >>> Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) > >>> Lead IBM DITA Architect > >>> mpriestl@ca.ibm.com <mailto:mpriestl@ca.ibm.com> > >>> http://dita.xml.org/blog/25 <http://dita.xml.org/blog/25> > >>> > >>> From: > >>> Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org <mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> To: > >>> Michael Priestley/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA > >>> > >>> Cc: > >>> dita@lists.oasis-open.org <mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org> , "Don Day > >>> (LbW)" <donday@learningbywrote.com <mailto:donday@learningbywrote.com> >, > >>> Kristen Eberlein <keberlein@sdl.com <mailto:keberlein@sdl.com> > > >>> > >>> Date: > >>> 10/05/2010 11:52 AM > >>> > >>> Subject: > >>> Re: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we can send the DITA > >>> 1.2 > >>> spec to OASIS for a vote > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Michael, > >>> > >>> You would need to submit by 15 Oct for a November vote; that > can't happen > >>> since you'll still be out for public review. I agree and typically advise > >>> against December votes, however WebCGM has done it and passed so we know > >>> it's possible, and certainly DITA has a much larger following > than WebCGM. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Mary > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Michael Priestley wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Mary, > >>> > >>> I think we're really looking for a standard in 2010. My one > concern is that > >>> a December vote would be hard to get numbers for. > >>> > >>> Is there any way to move up the process to allow a vote in November? > >>> > >>> Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM) > >>> Lead IBM DITA Architect > >>> mpriestl@ca.ibm.com <mailto:mpriestl@ca.ibm.com> > >>> http://dita.xml.org/blog/25 <http://dita.xml.org/blog/25> > >>> > >>> From: > >>> Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org <mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> To: > >>> Kristen Eberlein <keberlein@sdl.com <mailto:keberlein@sdl.com> > > >>> > >>> Cc: > >>> "Don Day (LbW)" <donday@learningbywrote.com > >>> <mailto:donday@learningbywrote.com> >, <dita@lists.oasis-open.org > >>> <mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org> > > >>> > >>> Date: > >>> 10/05/2010 11:18 AM > >>> > >>> Subject: > >>> Re: [dita] Changes in OASIS TC processes and when we can send the DITA > >>> 1.2 > >>> spec to OASIS for a vote > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> Thanks, Kris, for drawing everyone's attention to the process > changes about > >>> to take place. I think the TC is well within the timeline to > get to ballot > >>> in Dec or Jan under the old rules unless another round of changes is > >>> anticipated after the public review that is about to be announced. > >>> > >>> The one point to consider if it's delayed beyond that is that another 60 > >>> day > >>> public review will be required at the new Candidate OASIS Standard stage. > >>> > >>> I am planning to come to each TC meeting for a quick review of > the changes > >>> and to answer any questions and will be sending a message later > in the week > >>> requesting a 15-min time slot. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Mary > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Oct 5, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Kristen Eberlein wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, Don and the rest of the DITA TC. > >>> > >>> I have an additional item that I think should move to the front of the > >>> agenda for todayıs meeting. It concerns changes in TC rules and when we > >>> anticipate being able to get the DITA 1.2 spec out for an OASIS vote. (I > >>> also think that we need to work on the items that must be > submitted to Mary > >>> at the same time as the request for an OASIS vote; see items > highlighted in > >>> red below.) > >>> > >>> Will we potentially be able to send the DITA 1.2 spec out for a vote in > >>> 2010, or will it need to happen in 2011? > >>> > >>> Under the old rules, the following conditions apply, which > would mean that > >>> the earliest an OASIS vote could occur is December 16-31. > >>> > >>> · The DITA TC can approve a committee specification no > sooner than > >>> seven days after a public review ends. The vote is by ballot that OASIS > >>> administration sets up. The TC can simultaneously request to submit the > >>> Committee Specification to the Membership of OASIS for > consideration as an > >>> OASIS Standard. > >>> · Upon resolution of the TC to submit the specification for > >>> consideration as an OASIS standard, the TC submits the following items > >>> (copied verbatim) to the TC Administrator: > >>> > >>> > >>> · (a) Links to the approved Committee Specification in the TCıs > >>> document repository, and any appropriate supplemental > documentation for the > >>> specification, both of which must be written using the OASIS > templates. The > >>> specification may not have been changed between its approval as > a Committee > >>> Specification and its submission to OASIS for consideration as an OASIS > >>> Standard, except for the changes on the title page and running > footer noting > >>> the approval status and date. > >>> > >>> > >>> · (b) The editable version of all files that are part of the > >>> Committee Specification; > >>> > >>> > >>> · (c) Certification by the TC that all schema and XML instances > >>> included in the specification, whether by inclusion or > reference, including > >>> fragments of such, are well formed, and that all expressions are valid; > >>> > >>> > >>> · (d) A clear English-language summary of the specification; > >>> > >>> > >>> · (e) A statement regarding the relationship of this > specification > >>> to similar work of other OASIS TCs or other standards developing > >>> organizations; > >>> > >>> > >>> · (f) The Statements of Use presented above; > >>> > >>> > >>> · (g) The beginning and ending dates of the public review (s), a > >>> pointer to the announcement of the public review(s), and a pointer to an > >>> account of each of the comments/issues raised during the public review > >>> period(s), along with its resolution; > >>> > >>> > >>> · (h) An account of and results of the voting to approve the > >>> specification as a Committee Specification, including the date of the > >>> ballot > >>> and a pointer to the ballot; > >>> > >>> > >>> · (i) An account of or pointer to votes and comments received in > >>> any > >>> earlier attempts to standardize substantially the same specification, > >>> together with the originating TCıs response to each comment; > >>> > >>> > >>> · (j) A pointer to the publicly visible comments archive for the > >>> originating TC; > >>> > >>> > >>> · (k) A pointer to any minority reports delivered by one or more > >>> Members who did not vote in favor of approving the Committee > Specification, > >>> which report may include statements regarding why the member > voted against > >>> the specification or that the member believes that Substantive > Changes were > >>> made which have not gone through public review; or certification by the > >>> Chair that no minority reports exist. > >>> > >>> > >>> · The above submission must be made by the 15th of any > month to the > >>> TC Administrator, who shall have until the end of the month to complete > >>> administrative processing and checking for completeness and > correctness of > >>> the submission. If the submission is incomplete it shall be rejected but > >>> may > >>> be resubmitted at a later time. > >>> > >>> > >>> · The TC Administrator shall submit the proposal to the OASIS > >>> Membership by the first day of the following month. The first 15 days of > >>> that month shall be used by the membership to familiarize themselves with > >>> the submission. Voting shall start on the 16th of the month. The voting > >>> representatives of those OASIS Organizational Members who were members at > >>> the beginning of the familiarization period are eligible to > vote, and must > >>> cast their ballots by the end of the month. > >>> > >>> > >>> The new rules introduce the following changes (as well as others): > >>> > >>> > >>> · There is no longer a fixed timeline requiring submissions to be > >>> made by the 15th of the month; submissions may be made at any time. > >>> > >>> > >>> · No familiarization period is required prior to a vote by OASIS > >>> membership. > >>> Best regards, > >>> Kris > >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL > >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l > >>> keberlein@sdl.com <mailto:kduffy@sdl.comI> > >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/> > >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > >>> > >>> From: Don Day (LbW) [mailto:donday@learningbywrote.com > >>> <mailto:donday@learningbywrote.com> ] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 8:48 AM > >>> To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org <mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> ; > >>> kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org <mailto:kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> > >>> Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org <mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org>; Kristen > >>> Eberlein > >>> Subject: Re: [dita] When will the 15-day review be announced > >>> > >>> Hi. I'm bumping this request in hopes that I can provide the DITA TC with > >>> an > >>> outlook at our meeting coming up later this morning. Given that the > >>> requested changes were timely effected due to prioritized > turnaround on our > >>> end, I thought it would be considerate to get a sooner response. > >>> -- > >>> Don Day > >>> Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee > >>> > >>> On 9/30/2010 1:33 PM, Kristen Eberlein wrote: > >>> Hi, Mary and Kim. > >>> > >>> When will the 15-day review be announced? > >>> Best regards, > >>> Kris > >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL > >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l > >>> keberlein@sdl.com <mailto:kduffy@sdl.comI> > >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/> > >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > >>> > >>> From: Kristen Eberlein [mailto:keberlein@sdl.com <mailto:keberlein@sdl.com > > > >>> ] > >>> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:05 AM > >>> To: Kim Goolsby; Mary McRae > >>> Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org <mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org> > >>> Subject: RE: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin > >>> Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2 > >>> > >>> Many thanks, Kim! > >>> Best regards, > >>> Kris > >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL > >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l > >>> keberlein@sdl.com <mailto:kduffy@sdl.comI> > >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/> > >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > >>> > >>> From: Kim Goolsby [mailto:kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org > >>> <mailto:kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> ] > >>> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:26 AM > >>> To: Mary McRae > >>> Cc: Kristen Eberlein; dita@lists.oasis-open.org > >>> <mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org> > >>> Subject: Re: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin > >>> Information Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2 > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I'll upload the spec this morning. I am so glad this is resolved! > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> Kim > >>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> (one more time, sorry) > >>> > >>> And my apologies to Kim for trying to answer too many questions > at once and > >>> not paying close attention to the matter at hand. > >>> > >>> Mary > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> Hi Kristen, > >>> > >>> Yes, that's fine since you have the separate change log; while the blank > >>> page isn't perfect, it doesn't harm or detract in any way. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Mary > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Kristen Eberlein wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, Kim. > >>> > >>> 1. Since the ³Revision history² was indicated as optional in the > >>> OASIS template, we decided to omit it from our committee drafts.Therefore > >>> we do not want to reintroduce it at this point. > >>> 2. I can delete page 1237 from the PDF output. However, all the > >>> pages > >>> will continue to be marked with ³Page x of 1237.² I think retaining the > >>> blank page is better. > >>> > >>> Thoughts? I very much appreciate your help with this matter. > >>> Best regards, > >>> Kris > >>> Kristen James Eberlein l DITA Architect and Technical Specialist l SDL > >>> Structured Content Technologies Division l (t) + 1 (919) 682-2290 l > >>> keberlein@sdl.com <mailto:kduffy@sdl.comI> > >>> <image001.jpg> <http://www.sdl.com/> > >>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > >>> > >>> From: Kim Goolsby [mailto:kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org > >>> <mailto:kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> ] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:42 PM > >>> To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org <mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org> > >>> Cc: mary.mcrae > >>> Subject: [dita] Changes required to submitted document - Darwin > Information > >>> Typing Architecture (DITA) Version 1.2 > >>> > >>> TCADMIN-243 <http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TCADMIN-243> > >>> > >>> Please make the following change: > >>> > >>> 1. Please add a 'Revision History' appendix to this document. > >>> 2. Looking at the pdf, there is an empty page 1237 at the end of the > >>> document. I suggest removing this. > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> Kim > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Kim Goolsby > >>> Publications Specialist > >>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society > >>> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org <mailto:kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> > >>> web: www.oasis-open.org <http://www.oasis-open.org/> > >>> phone: 1.734.223.6890 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Mary P McRae > >>> OASIS > >>> Director, Standards Development > >>> TC Administrator > >>> Member Section Administrator > >>> OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society > >>> email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org > >>> phone: 603.232.9090 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Kim Goolsby > >>> Publications Specialist > >>> OASIS Open: Advancing open standards for the information society > >>> email: kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org <mailto:kim.goolsby@oasis-open.org> > >>> web: www.oasis-open.org <http://www.oasis-open.org/> > >>> phone: 1.734.223.6890 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > -- > Eliot Kimber > Senior Solutions Architect > "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" > Main: 512.554.9368 > www.reallysi.com > www.rsuitecms.com > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]